Re: Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board
Posted: March 15th, 2024, 10:15 am
All of that looks good to me.
Architecture, Development, and Infrastructure of the Twin Cities
https://urbanmsp.com/
That bridge has significant conflicts between cyclists and pedestrians since the pedestrian area is about one person wide. Bikes come down the hill pretty fast from the south and the north end is pretty blind. I see these improvements the most important out of them.If any of these had to be dropped for budget considerations, I don't think the improvements at "Area I" are that critical. A "nice to have", sure, but some of the ped-bike (and bike-bike) conflicts there could be improved with some striping alterations and signs asking people to slow down / yield. There is zero potential for conflicts with cars in this location, so to me it just doesn't rise to the level of importance of the other projects.